Church of the Resurrection Splits Away – Again

More news on the “Episcopalian/Anglican schism” front: a local church held its final service as an Episcopalian congregation Sunday, and after the service they walked their cross, altar, and vestments down the street to a new facility, to reopen as an Anglican parish under the authority of the Church of Uganda. It was splashed all over the Sun-Times, and the images included lots of children waving banners, and young men bearing an altar cross with a very large crown of thorns.

The thing is, this particular church has apparently been split before, as there are TWO churches named “Resurrection” in the area, one that split more than 10 years ago over the issue of homosexuality. The other (original?) one is under the authority of the Church of Rwanda. The later one seems to be the “remnant” that was left in 1994 after the first split.

It’s all very confusing. Part of the reason there’s so much ferment there is it’s in the area of Wheaton College, a source of young evangelical college students interested in the “emerging church” or “new liturgy” thread of evangelicalism.

The front-page picture from the Sun-Times article today is here. One commenter at The Chicagoist noted with surprise that “these were the people protesting gay rights.” I also had a moment of “What? isn’t this church leaving because they don’t agree with the rest of us on gay clergy and bishops? But these guys look…kinda…yeah.”

The website for Resurrection Anglican doesn’t have a history, although their pastor’s bio page will suffice. He’s been there since 1994.

The older “Rez” left the Episcopal Church way back in 1993, and now call themselves simply “The Church of the Resurrection.” A great deal of their ministry at the time seemed to be centered on “healing…the sexually wounded and struggling.” I suppose this means they claim to help gay people become straight… whether ministry or therapy, the concept is controversial and not necessarily helpful.

They will shortly be hosting the appearance of Archbishop Peter Akinola on September 27th. I wonder if the folks from the newer Resurrection Anglican will drop by? And what was the result of the “second significant split?” I don’t know.

About Us | Church of the Resurrection

By October 1990, the church finally reached a size that could become a self-sustaining parish. The very same month that Church of the Resurrection moved from mission status to became a parish, it also began celebrating its main service at the West Chicago High School auditorium. This then-radical step launched the church into a new era of expanded worship and an outreach. Families from across the Chicago region made it their church home. The church began taking in new parishioners that in many cases had come from across the country to be part of a place that sought to offering healing, especially for the sexually wounded and struggling.This special calling became the presenting issue that altered Church of the Resurrection’s denominational affiliation with the Episcopal Church in the U.S.A. For Church of the Resurrection, a church that offered, among other ministries, specific help and healing for people involved in homosexuality, the denomination’s more liberal stance seemed to us a contradiction of Scripture and a denial of the work of the Holy Spirit in this church. Eventually it became clear that communion was shattered, and the Vestry voted to disassociate from the Diocese, effective November 30, 1993.

The church incorporated itself as the Church of the Resurrection of Illinois, and continued meeting at Edman Chapel on the campus of Wheaton College, which had already become our primary sanctuary of praise. To this day, the Lord has continued to have us in “temporary” facilities as we have focused on our mission and ministry and sought his leading.

The church grew rapidly following our disassociation. But without a bishop to help us navigate these years, the Church of the Resurrection experienced significant growing pains and struggles in the late 1990s, including two significant church splits. Though the church has experienced reconciliation with those who have left, this period taught us to listen more patiently and humbly to the Lord in the midst of crisis, and to sharpen our focus and calling.

They’re now part of a cluster of AMiA congregations centered on Wheaton. Which seems to be the place to be if you’re an evangelical in Anglican vestments, I guess.

RFID implants (for humans) linked to animal tumors – Boing Boing

The hell with humans – what about our beloved little cat Riley?  He’s chipped, though the studies seem to have been just on mice and not on cats or dogs. Is he at risk? I’ve just fired off a query to Avid,  the manufacturer for clarification or comment. Their email address was not easy to find, but turned out to be on their online ordering page. It’s info@avidmicrochip.com

Also, near the bottom of the news article is a long section detailing former HHS secretary Tommy Thompson’s business relationship with the VeriChip corporation, and wondering whether he had anything to do with expediting the company’s rather easy FDA approval for implanting their chips in humans, or benefited financially.

RFID implants linked to animal tumors – Boing Boing

VeriChip — and other vendors — have been busily implanting radio-frequency ID (RFID) chips in human and animal subjects ever since the FDA approved the process. But a series of studies conducted from 1996-2006 noted a high incidence of dangerous tumors arising at the sites of RFID implants — something the FDA apparently did not consider when it approved the procedure.

[tags]BoingBoing, microchips, cancer, animals, Avid, FDA[/tags]

Across the Divide: BRAAAINSSSsss

Could there be a psychological or neurological reason why some people tend to be conservative, while others tend to be liberal? Possibly; and it might extend to how people think about new scientific ideas, political concepts, and even matters of faith.  This might explain a lot about the current divide between the liberal and conservative wings of various Protestant churches, including my own. The “persistent in their judgements” sure sounds familiar. So does the “structured” model versus “anything goes, you adorable herd of cat-nuns” model.

Their brains are different from our brains! Their zombies won’t eat our brainsssss, and our zombies won’t eat their brainsssss!  No wonder each side says of the other “there’s no talking to those people.”

Compare this to this and it’s pretty clear, at least in the Anglican world. One well-known bishop sets out his rules very clearly and firmly on the “conservative” diocesan website, and another one has a lot of helpful information, handbooks, and guidelines to browse on the “liberal” diocesan website.

Economist’s View: Brain Study: Liberals and Conservatives Differ

Scientists at New York University and UCLA showed through a simple experiment to be reported Monday in the journal Nature Neuroscience that political orientation is related to differences in how the brain processes information.Previous psychological studies have found that conservatives tend to be more structured and persistent in their judgments whereas liberals are more open to new experiences. The latest study found those traits are not confined to political situations but also influence everyday decisions.

Davis Mac-Iyalla: Probably Can’t Attend Akinola Protest

From the ongoing discussion at Father Jake’s regarding the protest of border-crossing Bishop Akinola in Wheaton: a commenter has posted a press release from Changing Attitudes Nigeria director Davis Mac-Iyalla, the gay Anglican activist from Nigeria who is now living in exile in Togo. He regrets that he probably won’t be able to arrange a visa and funds for travel in time to walk the picket line.

Father Jake Stops the World: Protest Against Abp. Akinola on September 23

Changing Attitude Nigeria fully supports the plans of peaceful demonstration against our homophobic Archbishop Peter Akinola.

Archbishop Peter Akinola keeps refusing to start a listening process in Nigeria or to create a safe place for lesbian and gay people to tell our story.

The Archbishop and the Church of Nigeria is strongly supporting and advocating for a bill that will make Changing Attitude Nigeria illegal and any priest or bishop who listens to our story will be jailed for 5 yeas including we LGBT Nigerians.

The recent comments from Bishop Orama of Uyo are abusive and make life for LGBT people in Nigeria very dangerous. We condemn the Archbishops for their silence in not responding and not calling on Bishop Orama to apologise.

Archbishop Akinola has abandoned his pastoral duty to the Church of Nigeria and has joined forces with some American conservatives to cross boundaries and cause problems for the Episcopal Church just because they stand for what they believe: that all Gods children should be included and not be discriminated against.

We call on all true believers in truth and equality to join in this protest.

If it were not for the reasons of cost and visa, the Director of Changing attitude Nigeria is very willing to be there in person to give support to our American brothers and sisters.

We thank all those who have volunteered to play a part in stopping the world’s most homophobic Archbishop trying to take control of the Anglican Communion and the Episcopal Church.

In solidarity
Davis Mac-Iyalla
Director, Changing Attitude Nigeria

[tags]Episcopal, Anglican, schism, gay clergy, homophobia[/tags]

Salt Lake Tribune – Keep a distance: Seminary, school should be in separate buildings

Salt Lake Tribune – Keep a distance: Seminary, school should be in separate buildings

In Lindon, a new charter school – a public school that operates with taxpayer money – and a seminary operated by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints are occupying the same building.
That doesn’t technically violate the constitutional mandate that government not support or endorse any religion, since each organization separately leases its space. The Karl G. Maeser Preparatory Academy and the seminary don’t even share an entrance. But the perception is there that the public school is simply too cozy with the LDS Church. And that makes a significant number of people, already sensitive to the church’s influence in Utah, uncomfortable.

Given that precisely that perception is reality to so many, either the school or the church should look for other quarters.

I was a public school student in Utah about 30-40 years ago, but it didn’t matter one bit then that the LDS seminary buildings in junior high and high school were not in the same building – I still had to listen to what everybody else was hearing about. Every day in more than one class, I’d overhear what the other kids had seen or heard in their “sem” classes – gossipy stuff about the videotaped soap opera that was the big thing in junior high, and whispered stuff about what the high school seminary classes were covering about more adult topics like dating within vs. without the faith.

People talked around me as if I had been there, or more significantly, as if I wasn’t there at all. I was invisible.

It was not a comfortable place to be a “not.” It was not a friendly and fun place to be a “non.” I spent my entire school career feeling ever-so-slightly unwelcome all the time, and sometimes I felt like there was nowhere to hide from enemies who wanted to hunt me down for being “differnt”, and nowhere to find friends who might accept me without asking what church my family attended, before deciding if it was okay to be seen with me.

Before we actually attended any church, of course, I was almost completely on my own… once we started attending a Protestant church regularly and I joined a Masonic girls’ group, I had friends, but not at school. With one exception – Mark, who went to my church, also went to my grade school. We were buddies the last couple of years there, but he went to a different junior high although we still were in youth group together. And then when we got to high school, his family had moved, and we ended up graduating together.

My 30th high school reunion was supposed to be last year, but it was cancelled or postponed due to the very sad death of Steve Tempest, who had been student body president and was one of the organizers. He was a good guy, who did good things in his life. I ran into him unexpectedly on a trip to Salt Lake years ago, and was totally surprised find out that he knew who I was in school – actually knew my name.

You could have knocked me over with a feather, as it was a revelation to me to realize that I hadn’t been as invisible as I thought I was in high school. You’d think that a big, tall, red-headed girl with a goofy laugh would find it hard to be invisible, but I was, at least as far as I could tell. So to be greeted by name by somebody who was “somebody,” after so many years, was really odd.

I did attend one reunion at about the 10-year mark and amused myself by covering up my nametag and going up to former jocks and saying “You don’t know who the hell I am, do you?” That was a fun time, but the fact that there was alcohol probably made it easier.  Utah does things like that to you, or did then, anyway. If you drink socially, you drink as conspicuously as possible in order to show everyone else you’re “not” like them. It can make for some rather colorful stories afterwords (and worse hangovers than necessary).  If you use bad language, you use it as conspicuously as possible, too. I always start swearing more when on trips to Utah – it kind of creeps my husband David out, especially if I get together with my salty oldest niece, Holly (she’s David’s age). Then: look out.

During the time I was staying at Mom’s house trying to sort stuff out after she died in 2006, somebody called me to get my mailing address and email address so that I could be contacted for whenever the reunion happened. It was supposed to have been this August, but I never heard a word. I checked with Mark, and he never got a response to his emails, either.

Oh well. I expect there was some kind of event, probably locally organized and arranged, and someone dropped the ball on contacting the “unsocial” types such as myself and Mark, who were kind of non-entities in school because of our “differnts” and didn’t stay in touch with many other people after graduation. As a hopelessly disorganized person myself, I can understand if the information didn’t get collected and organized and used effectively, but it would have been nice to be invited, even if there was no way in Hell that I’d bother to attend. I don’t know anybody anymore, Mom’s not there anymore, I don’t want to see what’s become of our old house since it was sold, and I’m not skinny and gorgeous and well-preserved enough to show up with a glint in my eye at the classic reunion dance, in a kind of “wallflower’s revenge fantasy.”

As far as I know, seminary classes are still conducted across the street from my old high school; Salt Lake has gotten more culturally diverse since my school days, but I bet the “nons” and “nots” still have a pretty good idea of what’s being taught and discussed in the building across the street. It’s probably still inescapable.

Reaching Across the Divide

The Lead

The article talks about Bishop Persell’s commitment to trying to find a middle ground that will [enable? help?]the Church to comprehend different understandings of how to be Christian in the world

bishopwilliamcrop.jpg

I missed this article from June; I just noticed it because I was checking background on a more timely news story detailed below. +William Persell is my bishop and I know how hard he’s worked to try to keep lines of communication open. I’ll do my best to remember it in the coming weeks, as clearly he would wish us all to do. The article mentions Fr. Martin Johnson, who now leads an Anglican Mission in America congregation in Wheaton, one of 5 that will gather to hear Bishop Peter Akinola speak in a few weeks. In the meantime, Fr. Martin’s group has been asked to rescind an invitation to speak they had made to Paul Rusesabagina, of Hotel Rwanda fame. Fr. Martin’s Rwandan bishop, Emmanuel Kolini, ordered that this event be cancelled:

Rusesabagina has been at odds with the president of Rwanda. The archbishop feared that the event could create a strain in the relationship between the Anglican Church of Rwanda and the government.

[A]fter President Kagame found out Rusesabagina was supposed to speak to speak at a church overseen by archbishop of Rwanda, he contacted Kolini, who then told the church to cancel the event, Johnson said.

“The bigger reality for us is having to accept the whole concept of obedience, and that is a harder cultural pill to swallow than I realized,” he said. “I’m forced to encounter my own resistance and bias.”

Johnson, who was previously a priest in the Episcopal Church, has been under the Rwandan authority since 2004.

What a desperately sad position to be in. If Fr. Martin hadn’t come to the parting of the ways over homosexuality in the church, he’d still be under the authority of his friend, Bishop Persell, who would enthusiastically support the speaking event with Paul Rusesabagina. But now he may be facing his old friend, literally or figuratively from across a divide, when +Akinola comes to preach in Wheaton. A protest group will attend Mass downtown at the cathedral, and then head out to Wheaton to walk a picket line that day. I don’t know if Bishop Persell will be part of it – probably not, given his schedule and health issues.

Note: I took the photo of Bishop William Persell on the occasion of his visit to Holy Innocents in Hoffman Estates, a year or so before the building was closed. I was struck by the way his episcopal ring glowed as he gestured (gently, so as not to slop coffee everywhere).

[tags]Episcopal, Anglican, schism, liberal, conservative, gay clergy, Rwanda, Paul Rusesabagina[/tags]