Squirrelly little guy flew with the dinosaurs | Chicago Tribune

Squirrelly little guy flew with the dinosaurs | Chicago Tribune

A furry, squirrel-sized creature that soared through prehistoric skies–possibly even sharing the lofty view with birds' first ancestors–suggests that mammals took flight nearly 70 million years earlier than scientists had thought.

The evidence comes in the form of a squashed skeleton found in Inner Mongolia that belonged to a tree-inhabiting creature born with a built-in hang glider–a fold of furry skin that stretched between its front and hind legs.

This news item sent me Googling around to chase down an old, old memory from college: a professor of evolution who did an extremely funny and effective impression of a flying squirrel getting ready to hop off a branch and glide. I still remember how he popped his head up and down and spread his professorial tweed jacket in a perky little "gonna fly now" mammalian display.

It was a full-year class which fulfilled part of the science requirements. I stayed on for the whole year, because he was not only amusing and a good instructor, but his wife made him bring donuts and coffee to final exams, as we were an early morning class. His affection for flying squirrels was so great that he and a number of other grad students dressed up as furry gliders for Halloween when he was younger, and that was why he described the costumes and exhibited the behavior for our class one chilly October morning 30 years ago.

To my delight, Prof. William Bradshaw is still at the University of Oregon, which has its own ecology and evolutionary development department now. He seems to have been using mosquitoes for most of his research all this time with his partner… although I'm sure he's pretty happy about this new "furry glider" evolutionary discovery, I bet he does a mean mosquito impression, too.

Station: Falling the First Time

Flickr

This is an example of the kinds of things we're going to be moving from Holy Moly to St Nicholas. It's one of the Stations of the Cross that was made by one of our parishioners, and I think it represents Jesus falling the first time on the long walk to Calvary.

If you look closely, you can see two honkin' big wood screws going right up His robe. Also, it's really battered and like all the rest, really dusty and cobwebby. The ladies from the Altar Guild no longer dust these, because they regularly got pulled from the wall and broken because their dusters, or the silk scarves used to cover them in Holy Week would catch on them.

It's about the size of a large framed picture, and the open frame is made from very rustic, splintery wood. I'm not sure what the figures are modeled from, but I suspect all Stations were made from discarded or recycled building materials from when the church was built, or perhaps the parishioner was in construction.

It's definitely not my favorite. I purposely took the photo under moody, low-light conditions because flash just throws all the unfortunate detail into stark relief. It's not bad-looking now, and has a definite feeling of the agony it's meant to convey, but it's pretty primitive when seen close up under strong light.

I guess you'd call these an example of outsider art.

Via: Flickr Title: Station: Falling the First Time By: GinnyRED57
Originally uploaded: 13 Dec '06, 9.59pm CST PST

Fraught Process

My little Episcopal parish, Holy Moly, is closing at the end of this month.

I'm part of the lay leadership; I'm involved in this process. If you had told me 5 years ago when I reluctantly agreed to be on the Bishop's Committee that I'd be part of the stubborn remainder that had to come to this decision and actually deal with the physical and emotional and spiritual challenges that come with closing a church, I'd have said "no way. Not gonna do it."

Well, here I am, in at the death.

In my time, I've attended probably 50 normal B.C. meetings, and about 10 or 20 meetings related to church in some way, maybe more if you count the joint Lenten and Advent meetings we used to have with a former "yoking" partner. Many of the meetings had an anxious subtext: "How are we doing? Can we cut more from the budget? Can we get through another year? Can we find a partner? Can we talk to some other Episcopalians about being a really, really small church? How long can we go on?" 

We had another joint meeting last night with the Bishop's Committee from the parish we're merging with. There's a lot of stuff to be discussed in the very few weeks we have left, as our closing service is December 31, the "transferred" feast of the Holy Innocents.  Our vicar, a very gentle soul, earnestly laid out an ambitious program to create several smaller working groups to cover specific issues (he purposely avoided calling them "committees"). The issues include liturgy/music, finance, outreach/evangelism, care/healing, and so on. 

And then he said the "M" word. He mentioned in passing that perhaps some of these committees might need to week much more often than monthly as in the full BC meeting. Some might need to get together every week to discuss things and keep ideas and goals and tasks moving and on track.

My friend the Warden, a woman who took on the mantle of leadership because none of the rest of us wanted to do it when the previous warden resigned, dissolved in tears. She simply could not handle the thought of yet another meeting.

There were tears in the sacristy as well; when you have worked the better part of a lifetime to help make a beautiful and meaningful Eucharist by providing the painstaking labor to ensure that "fair linens" are truly fair, it's hard to stand unmoved when the vestments and vessels you've cared for are being discussed as if they were housewares.

One couple brought wedding pictures – they were married at Holy Moly several decades ago.

It's really hard for the long-timers, who were there at the founding. They know the story of how the altar was built, and who made the embroidered banners, and how the modern steeple used to have stained glass in it that fell down and through the skylight one day during Mass. Right over the altar, showering the then-priest with broken glass, as he was about to serve the Eucharist.

I'm a short-timer; I've only been there 5 years. In that time, I've seen the numbers dwindle, and in the last year it seemed like every month, another face or family was MIA. They just got tired of waiting for the end to happen, and didn't want to be there for the unpleasant reality that we all face at the end of December. After the Eucharist on New Year's Eve Sunday, we'll have a party downstairs, while upstairs some people will busy themselves with dismantling the most essential of our liturgical "furniture" that must go with us to St Nicholas, and they'll carefully move it and install it there that afternoon.

I mentioned in the meeting last night, as we were getting lost in the discussion of how it would work to have some people partying and reminiscing downstairs while others were working and disassembling upstairs, that some people were meant to be movers, and some were meant to be shakers. There'll be a whole lot of moving and shaking going on before we're done.

The essential items appear to be:

  • The Columbarium – ashes of some of our dead are in this, which is mounted on the wall
  • The Risen Christ/Christus Rex – mounted on a pipe over and behind the altar
  • Various chalices, vestments, vessels, hand chimes, prayer books, some hymnals
  • a statue of Mary, and a couple of embroidered banners, a portable font, and so on.

Non-essential items include the Stations of the Cross, which are all about the size of a picture frame and in very bad repair. They've been repaired many times, and the one with the big wood screws that go right up our Lord's bottom really, really bothers me. Still, they hold a lot of meaning for some people, so they'll be repaired if possible, and put in storage for later. There's also a very big carved crucifix that is simply too big for the new space at this time. Several people seem to find this disturbing, but we'll find a way to use it if only during Holy Week, I suspect. 

Frankly, we've got a problem. We'll do all this work, get all this stuff moved, and some of it will be stored in the basement of a parishionerr. And then, I fear, a significant number of us will decide that we can't make the move spiritually or emotionally, once the physical task is accomplished. We won't have familiar music, at least not at first, because we won't have an organ. We won't have a regular musician to play the portable keyboard, either, which is one reason why membership has fallen off so steeply since the beginning of summer. We'll struggle on, attempting to do things without music, or to sing hymns a cappella. It's going to be rough. 

There are hopes and plans for an eventual digital organ, an impossibly expensive instrument on our budget unless the diocese secures one from some other distressed parish. I'm hopeful, but fear that we're grasping at straws on that one.  

The current congregation at St Nicholas is losing some of the ways they do things, in the merger. They're much more informal and loosey-goosey about the Eucharist, and their music and liturgy are very contemporary and sort of "hey, let's have the kids do church!" They like church their way. They like the contemporary music, which is "easy to sing for those without much musical training." They like to have all the kids running around underfoot and out of control. 

Meh. It bothers me.

I'm going along with everything and I'm even a little excited when I'm not dreading the last couple of "big" services at Holy Moly (I'm worried about the organist for Christmast Eve… and lack of rehearsal time or discussion of what we're singing). But I'm worried that we're going to get our "stuff" moved over there, and those of us who are holding it together will sort of fall apart, and a couple of people who are already not coping with it will well and truly go to pieces.

The food pantry stuff excites me, and being part of a much more energized community excites me, but I won't know if I'll be excited to go to church there for a good long while yet. 

Real Life (and Death) Murder Mystery In Britain

Bloomberg.com: U.K.

Dec. 13 (Bloomberg) — A prostitute who was one of five suspected victims of a U.K. serial killer gave a television interview four days before she vanished.

Paula Clennell, 24, was filmed on Dec. 5 as she continued to walk the streets in the red light district of Ipswich, in the eastern English county of Suffolk, even though the body of one local prostitute had already been found and another was missing.

"I need the money,'' Clennell told regional broadcaster ITV Anglia. "I am a bit wary about getting into cars.'' Clennell was last seen on Dec. 9. Police believe two bodies found in Suffolk yesterday were Clennell and another prostitute Annette Nicholls, 29, although that has yet to be formally confirmed, Detective Chief Superintendent Stewart Gull said at a televised news conference today.

This developing story in Britain has all the elements of a classic modern murder mystery, perhaps by one of the gorier authors like P. D. James. It's almost as if the killer is staging a real-life limited series of "Prime Suspect." This latest twist is the creepiest of all, and strikes me as just the kind of up-the-ante plot twist you might find on any crime show.

It  makes me really question why it is that I find it so entertaining to read "cozy" murder mysteries and watch crime shows featuring creative new ways for people to die and for their murderers to be caught.

Why Is This Man Smiling?

NPR : Rumsfeld Makes Farewell Visit to Troops in Iraq

 

Rumsfeld in Iraq

 

This photo from NPR, via Getty Images, tells an untold story. Donald Rumsfeld, grinning widely, gets a last photo op with "the troops" that he was so instrumental in placing in harm's way.

The female Marine at lower right seems to be smiling politely. Maybe she's thinking "My mom/husband/kids will see me" and is happy at the prospect. The other Marines in the photo all look stonily and grimly at some other focal point. The one guy standing on the right looks directly  into the camera. I can't tell if his expression is "Hey, there's a camera down there too… oops," or "Can you getta loadda dis shit?"  

Why is Rumsfeld smiling? Is he determined to put on a happy face after finally getting an offer to resign accepted by Bush? Is he attempting to show that everything in Iraq is much, much better than the Iraq Study Group painted it to be this week? A bit of "too little, too late" flesh-pressing with the grunts? Or all three?  

Wessex Archaeology And Flickr

Wessex Archaeology And Flickr: How We Use Web 2.0 – 24 Hour Museum – official guide to UK museums, galleries, exhibitions and heritage

 

Roman Bowl

 

 

Wessex Archaeology is one of the largest commercial archaeological practices in the UK, employing over 160 people. We are a registered charity with educational objectives and play a vital role in helping people learn about their past.

In September 2005, we decided the Wessex Archaeology gallery (on the web) was looking a little long in the tooth. It was using a proprietary ASP gallery script and the process of uploading new photos was a pain. We had to manually create thumbnails, medium and large size versions of each photo, and follow a rigid structure. There was no chance for people to interact with the photos themselves, and the script itself was not particularly reliable.

This realisation triggered a review of our website strategy, stimulating an investigation into new 'web 2.0' approaches, such as social media, blogging, RSS and podcasting.

One of the major factors that makes Flickr a good service to use, is that they provide an API. They encourage people to build applications that use the photos that they host. This enabled us to build our photos back into our website with our own look and feel, and thus have our gallery accessible from two locations.

Using the FAlbum plugin for WordPress, the engine which powers our blogs, integration of our Flickr account into our own site was very simple. A simple install and quick edit to the templates, and it looked like the rest if our website. A quick edit to the main site navigation, and it was live, and updating itself from Flickr whenever we added a new photo or even changed a description. Since Flickr handles image resizing for you, there's even less work to do.

This is cool! As it happens, I've also implemented a Flickr/Wordpress plugin to pull my own (or anyone's) images into my blog. The gallery page is also part of the same plugin. So I was able to pull in the image above directly from Flickr, using the WordPress edit interface that's been updated with the Flickr FAlbum plugin.

Via Archeology in Europe