Iraqis Dying To Live In A Democracy

Bush admits `disquiet’ in nation | Chicago Tribune

But the president insisted his Iraq strategy will work: “There’s a deep desire by the Iraqi people to live in a democracy,” he said. And he urged Americans to be patient as his administration looks for ways to help ease the pain at the gas pump.

iraqiflatbed.jpg

Thanks to us, they’re dying for the chance to live free and to suffer less pain at the source of our gas.

Via Huffington Post’s Michael Shaw

Denial Is Just Another River In Egypt

Bush Says U.S. Spying Is Not Widespread – New York Times

The article, in USA Today, said that the agency did not listen to the calls, but secretly obtained information on numbers dialed by “tens of millions of Americans” and used it for “data mining” — computer analysis of large amounts of information for clues or patterns to terrorist activity.

Oh! Right! That’s all right then. This is just like an episode in NUMB3RS, isn’t it? This makes me feel much more trustiful about the .

So now I suppose the secretive and mysterious mathemeticians at the NSA will go back to illustrating their grand theories of where to find Osama Bin Laden by comparing the ebb and flow of millions of domestic phone calls to a gigantic pinball game, or to a spiderweb where they have to deduce the presence and location of an unknown number of big fat spiders, or something.

Do they illustrate their theoretical presentations with cool graphics, too?

Somehow, I don’t think the people working on this are quite the upstanding defenders of truth, justice and the American way that fictional characters Don and Charlie Epps are. Also, they’re probably not as hot in jeans and an open-neck shirt.

Making a hastily scheduled (emphasis Blogula Rasa’s)appearance in the White House, Mr. Bush did not directly address the collection of phone records, except to say that “new claims” had been raised about surveillance. He said all intelligence work was conducted “within the law” and that domestic conversations were not listened to without a court warrant.

“The privacy of all Americans is fiercely protected in all our activities,” he said. “Our efforts are focused on Al Qaeda and their known associates.”

Osama bin who? Zarqawi/Al Qaeda where?

Meanwhile, Mr. Pretendent, deny everything. Deny that this is not a huge shitstorm. Deny that it is not a threat to anyone’s Constitutional rights to privacy. Deny that you weren’t listening in last week when I was talking to my mom.

She doesn’t like you either, so there.

Tens Of Millions Of Us Are Al Qaeda

Now it’s coming out: the NSA’s stated goal is to create a database of every single call ever made within the US. They want the data so they can analyze call patterns, they say.

But the Pretendent of the United States of America is on record as saying only cross-border calls were to be tracked:

In defending the previously disclosed program, Bush insisted that the NSA was focused exclusively on international calls. “In other words,” Bush explained, “one end of the communication must be outside the United States.”

Uh huh. That was a while back ago. This quote is a little more recent:

The White House would not discuss the domestic call-tracking program. “There is no domestic surveillance without court approval,” said Dana Perino, deputy press secretary, referring to actual eavesdropping.

Oopsie. Your bad.

Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said he would call the phone companies to appear before the panel ”to find out exactly what is going on.”

Sen. Patrick Leahy of Vermont, the ranking Democrat on the panel, sounded incredulous about the latest report and railed against what he called a lack of congressional oversight. He argued that the media was doing the job of Congress.
”Are you telling me that tens of millions of Americans are involved with al Qaeda?” Leahy asked. ”These are tens of millions of Americans who are not suspected of anything … Where does it stop?”
The Democrat, who at one point held up a copy of the newspaper, added: ”Shame on us for being so far behind and being so willing to rubber stamp anything this administration does. We ought to fold our tents.”

The report came as the former NSA director, Gen. Michael Hayden – Bush’s choice to take over leadership of the CIA – had been scheduled to visit lawmakers on Capitol Hill Thursday. However, the meetings with Republican Sens. Rick Santorum of Pennsylvania and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska were postponed at the request of the White House, said congressional aides in the two Senate offices. (source: The Associated Press)

Oh – not even going to send him out to visit the reliable “friendlies?” Afraid of the questions that’ll be asked and the disruptive contentiousness of a press corps that’s finally waking up to its responsibilities to the country? Thank God for that, at least.

Durbin met with him yesterday and took no position; I bet he’s got one today. Time to drop him a line.

The Nuts Would Clog The Nozzle

Hey, I’m no rocket scientist, but I found the thought of candy-powered model rocketry pretty appealing:

Rocket Food – Popular Science

But you can liberate the same amount of energy in much less time by mixing the Snickers with a more concentrated source of oxygen—say, the potent oxidizer potassium perchlorate. The result is basically rocket fuel. Ig?nited on an open fireproof table, it burns vigorously, consuming an entire candy bar in a few seconds with a rushing tower of fire. If you could bottle the energy of kids playing and turn it into a Molotov cocktail, this is what it would look like.
Of course, you can’t actually fire a rocket with a Snickers bar; the nuts would clog the nozzle. Oreo cookie filling, however, works very nicely in standard model-rocket engines. (Caution: The Model Rocket Safety Code does not approve of filling rocket motors with highly reactive chlorate-Oreo mixtures.)

“The nuts would clog the nozzle.” Darn it, thought we had a brand-new energy source all lined up. I was all set to design hybrid rocket cars powered by Snickers Midnight Dark candy bars, too.

Darn those nuts, anyway. They hate our freedom.

Saw this on Boing Boing.

Willing To Pay The Slacker Tax

What? Me graduate? Perpetual UW-Whitewater student says no | Chicago Tribune

Lechner has had his story told in newspapers and network television shows, not to mention campus publications across the nation that have picked up stories from UW-Whitewater’s student newspaper, The Royal Purple.

By this spring he had completed 234 college credits, or about 100 more than needed to graduate, and was taking seven more.

That qualified him for the so-called “slacker tax,” instituted this school year by the UW Board of Regents to help cover the state subsidy for students who stay long past the usual four of five years to earn an undergraduate degree.

It calls for students who exceed 165 total credit hours or 30 more than their degree programs require — whichever is higher — to pay double tuition.

As a former 6th or 7th year senior, I have to admire Lechner’s perseverance. But I’m just a little curious about his financing, especially if he’s now paying the slacker tax.

When I was in school in Eugene all those years ago, there were a couple of perpetual students hanging around – we thought of them as pathetic losers who just wanted a cheap place to crash and do laundry. The names escape me know, but there were at least two on campus during my time in the late 70’s to mid 80’s.

One guy was a denizen of the men’s dorms on the north side of… Agate Street, I think. My friends Arne or Kevin *might* remember him, but the guy I’m thinking of hung around the dorm that faced right on Alder, and they were both “Tinglers.” This guy looked like he slept outside a lot – he was bearded, grizzled, and talked like an extra ranch hand in a B-grade horse opera. He was most famous for doing laundry (the dryers were free) by dumping other peoples’ clothes out on the floor, and for sleeping in the TV room, and for peeing in the corner of a hotel suite one weekend when a bunch of dorm people went on a ski trip. His most famous comment that weekend was “F$sk you and the horse you rode in on.” Somehow, he always obtained a valid key card and was considered a “student.”

The other guy was known to several of my friends as “the guy that hangs around the EMU (the student union).” He was understood to be a perpetual student with vague ties to the phys-ed/rec ed/Atari ed programs run out of the EMU recreational center. After hearing about him for a while, I actually took a bowling class with him, where he boasted quite openly about taking cornball classes just to keep his school funding coming in. And he really was a dab hand at Starship 1.

After some investigation, I find that even 30 years later, some things never change.

Rumsfeld vs. McGovern Edits

Media Matters collated several different news stories and compared different edits. Some edits amount, in varying degrees, to a lack of truthiness.

There’s a video clip with them all run together – it gets pretty repetitive. The interesting thing is the FOX news one – it shows how much more contentious the setting was, with two other protestors visible (one being grabbed by a security guard) and you can hear more heckling from people on both sides. Maybe FOX wanted to show how embattled Rummy was and how idiotic those damn liberrrls were to disrupt the proceedings.

Media Matters – NBC, CBS, Fox cropped Rumsfeld questioner’s challenges, Rumsfeld’s “stammer[ing]” replies

From Rumsfeld’s May 4 speech:

McGOVERN: Atlanta, September 27, 2002, Donald Rumsfeld said — and I quote: There’s “bulletproof” evidence of links between Al Qaeda and the government of President Saddam Hussein.

Was that a lie, Mr. Rumsfeld, or was that manufactured somewhere else? Because all of my CIA colleagues disputed that, and so did the 9-11 Commission.

And so I would like to ask you to be up front with the American people. Why did you lie to get us into a war that was not necessary and that has caused these kinds of casualties? Why?

RUMSFELD: Well, first of all, I haven’t lied. I did not lie then. Colin Powell didn’t lie. He spent weeks and weeks with the Central Intelligence Agency people and prepared a presentation that I know he believed was accurate. And he presented that to the United Nations.

The president spent weeks and weeks with the Central Intelligence people and he went to the American people and made a presentation. I’m not in the intelligence business. They gave the world their honest opinion. It appears that there were not weapons of mass destruction there.

McGOVERN: You said you knew where they were.

RUMSFELD: I did not. I said I knew where suspect sites were and we were just —

McGOVERN: You said you knew where they were near Tikrit, near Baghdad, and north, east, south, and west of there. Those are your words.

RUMSFELD: My words — my words were that — no, no, no wait a minute, wait a minute. Let him stay one second. Just a second.

McGOVERN: This is America.

RUMSFELD: You’re getting plenty of play, sir.

McGOVERN: I’d just like an honest answer.

RUMSFELD: I’m giving it to you.

McGOVERN: We’re talking about lies, and your allegation that there was “bulletproof” evidence of ties between Al Qaeda and Iraq. Was that a lie or were you misled?

RUMSFELD: Zarqawi was in Baghdad during the prewar period. That is a fact.

McGOVERN: Zarqawi? He was in the north of Iraq in a place where Saddam Hussein had no rule. That’s where he was.

RUMSFELD: He was also in Baghdad.

McGOVERN: Yeah, when he needed to go to the hospital. Come on, these people aren’t idiots. They know the story.

RUMSFELD: You are — let me give you an example. It’s easy for you to make a charge, but why do you think that the men and women in uniform, every day when they came out of Kuwait and went into Iraq, put on chemical weapon protective suits? Because they liked the style?

They honestly believed that there were chemical weapons. Saddam Hussein had used chemical weapons on his own people previously, he’d used them on his neighbor, the Iranians, and they believed he had those weapons. We believed he had those weapons.

McGOVERN: That’s what we call a non sequitur. It doesn’t matter what the troops believe, it matters what you believe.