Living Will

Inspired by satirist Adam Felber’s Living Will, my husband David posted the following:

Adam has the right idea here, although he puts a distinctly humorous slant on it.

I’m going to be a bit more serious about it.

Let’s make it perfectly clear here …

I David Michael Gibbs, being of sound mind and body (more or less), do hear-by state the following for the official record:

Should I ever be incapacitated, through injury or illness, to such an extent that I am unable to communicate at any level and the quality of my life is such that I am unable to enjoy it at a reasonable level, I wish that all extraordinary measures be withdrawn so that I may die with dignity. It is my fervent wish that I do not be come a burden on those who I love.

Since the above condition precludes my own participation in the decision process, the sole arbiter of my disposition shall be my wife: Virginia (Ginny) Elaine Gibbs. I would hope that she consult with, and consider advice from, everyone materially involved with my life and the situation (parents, siblings, friends, doctors, etc). I specifically forbid any legal body (court or legislature) from becoming involved, or trying to alter, the decision process.

Phew … that was a mouthful.

In all seriousness … I do NOT want anything like the Terri Schiavo garbage going on if I’m in a similar situation.

My mom calls this the “no heroics” clause. And for the record:

I, Virginia (Ginny) Elaine Baker Gibbs, being of sound mind and body, do hereby state that in the event I am incapacitated through injury or illness to such an extent that I am unable to communicate at any level and the quality of my life is such that I am unable to enjoy it at a reasonable level, I wish that all extraordinary measures be withdrawn so that I may die with dignity. It is my fervent wish that I do not be come a burden on those who I love.

Since the above condition precludes my own participation in the decision process, the sole arbiter of my disposition shall be my husband: David Michael Gibbs. I would hope that he consult with, and consider advice from, everyone materially involved with my life and the situation (parents, siblings, friends, doctors, etc). I specifically forbid any legal body (court or legislature) from becoming involved, or trying to alter, the decision process.

Another mouthful. When Pop died, he had been in a coma for a couple of weeks. The doctors prepared us with that charming “vegetable” analogy. My mom was horrified, because she knew exactly what she meant. I, being ten, couldn’t help imagining giant rutabagas and turnips lying in hospital beds.

Of course, my dad would have been a 6-foot carrot.

Anyway, Felber’s blog continues to be a lively resource for anyone heartily sick of the Terri Schiavo story. He’s stumbled onto an interesting fact: some of the so-called experts are vewwy, vewwy scwewy.

Nominating Hogzilla

AKMA wonders:

If there ever was a story destined to ornament the weekend NPR news quiz, this must be it. Margaret has been sending me snippets (“ ‘Our insides were just bubbling,’ said Darlene Turner”) and updates all morning. She wonders, does Accordion Guy have a line on this one?

More to the point, is humorist, WWDTM panelist and blogger Adam Felber even now working on making this story just ridiculous enough to fool a contestant into thinking it’s a ringer during the “fake news” segment?

I’m just bubbling inside thinking about it.

Scrimshaws and Pirates and Books, Oh My

My recent trip gave me a chance to see some actual scrimshaw up close and personal, rather than the sort often seen at Gus’s or Nelson’s blogs.

Hey! I’m about to get my copy of that book wot Gus wrote (with the kind assistance of some ghostwriter guy since Gus is a wanted man in Venezuela and several small, independently fiesty Caribbean island nations).

Gus thinks they moved up the publication date. Smart of them, since the book has been selling fairly briskly in pre-sales.

Pirates of Pensacolaby Keith Thomson
Thomas Dunne Books
Sales Rank: 30211
Pub Date: 01 April, 2005

Happy St Paddy’s

I’ve found a new music website – Accuradio.com. Ineresting – very configurable webradio. Got there via the rather stupid Windows Media radio tuner. Will probably connect directly since their tuner is way cooler.

It’s got gobs of Celtic channels and sub-channels, and it acts like a gigantic CD changer, with nice fast connections to Amazon pages for each CD. I’ll probably use it a lot at work.

So far, I’ve heard some great music:
The Bold Privateer, by Eliza Carthy
Old Blind Dogs
A self-released album called “Myxolydian” by Mark Saul
The Palace Theater, by Seven Nations
Boot Scootin’ Woman, by Oz Celtic-rock band The Borderers, featuring a pretty kick-ass accordion that Joey the Accordion Guy might like.
Kick-ass Galician bagpiper Xose Manuel Budino makes me want to go to Spain right now.

Got Cow?

elimdebbie_index.jpgAfter last week’s kick-ass TAR7 episode, we get this week’s suck-ass TAR7 episode. Although there was much, much, much that was great, well done, well edited, well raced about this week’s entry, a new kind of play has been introduced: “Bend Ze Rules.”

Rob and Amber continue in their quest to be the most polarizing team in Race history: once again, half the fans at TWOP and half the people in my office (the show has finally become a workplace hit) thought Rob’s use of an obscure rule to get out of doing an unpleaseant eating Roadblock task was smart play. The other half thought it sucked, that it means the end of TAR as we know it, and that cheating quitters should be eliminated.

There are also dark mutterings about Phil’s phawning treatment of Rob and Ambuh every time they hit the mat.

There was much complaining online about the continuing trend of high-volume, high-risk eating tasks, which started with the infamous “2 pounds of low-grade caviar” incident and the ostrich egg omelet in TAR5 and the horrific Hungarian paprikash-begosh soup Roadblock in TAR6.

It’s strange to me how on the one hand I detest and deplore Rob’s Survivor-style tactics, and then I have to admit that he’s got almost everyone dancing to his tune and focusing on his behavior rather than concentrating on the race. I hated how he quit the Roadblock, and gave him grudging kudos for correctly working out that taking a 4-hour penalty in a nasty task that is taking everyone behind him more than 4 or 5 hours to complete is a smaht move.

I hated how he cajoled two other teams into buying in to his “quit and wait out the penalty” strategy so he was guaranteed to have some cannon fodder behind him on the way to the Pit Stop mat. The penalty timer started as soon as the next team arrived at the Roadblock site, and it worked out that the next two “sheep” teams to follow his lead and quit would be racing each other after their penalties ran out, and Rob and Amber would have a comfortable lead on them.

Yet still I had to admit it made for entertaining television, as instead of heading to the mat to wait out the time as happened last season for a lost clue penalty, the Quitters had to wait at the Argentine barbecue gulag for their clocks to run down. And the watching, waiting, and commenting was… strangely compelling.

As was the groaning when someone new would arrive and sit down to their repast of 4 pounds of campfire-roasted cow, including an entire slab of ribs, kidney, intestine, and “saliva gland.” And be greeted by miserable competitors balancing dripping, greasy boards on their knees piled high with roast beast yet uneaten. And clouds of hungry flies. And the now-inevitable buckets.

“Deana. Oh, Deana” they would moan. Or, “Debbie. Debbie’s going to do it.”

Which was another reason I thought Rob was a puss – Debbie finished her cow and still got eliminated. Which wouldn’t seem to be fair, unless you consider that she and her kissy-face teammate congratulated themselves for their mad Spanish skillz about 2 1/2 hours in the wrong direction. It doesn’t matter if you can speak the lingo if you can’t also read the map-o.

Miss Alli has her mini-recap up already:

Well, this is confusing. Two things antithetical to everything this show should rightly be about — volume-based eating challenges and abandoning tasks — collide when the teams go to Argentina and are confronted with a Roadblock that involves eating four pounds of meat. So it’s not an “eat unfamiliar food; mind over matter” challenge, it’s just an “eat until you throw up, and then after you throw up into this bucket, eat some more” challenge. Apparently the sight of Freddy eating his own puke last season made somebody think that nothing goes as well with what should be a classy show like people being forced to eat until they’re sick. It also turns out that the show has informed the teams of the way the four-hour penalty works. Rob makes a run at the meat-eating, but ultimately concludes that in all likelihood, he’s not going to finish, and given his early arrival at the Roadblock, he gambles that he has a better shot at staying in the race by taking the penalty than by taking the time required to finish the food. Booo, quitting! On the other hand, he immediately goes into desperately-trying-to-stay-in-the-game mode, which takes some of the sting out of the quitting, and he convinces two other teams to abandon the task as well, meaning that he’s got company in whatever bad position he winds up as a result of taking the penalty. Moreover, all the teams have a nice bit of insurance based on the fact that Debbie and Bianca open the episode by driving two hours in the entirely wrong direction, having no idea where they’re going. Ultimately, Debbie and Bianca are so far behind that even after the other teams take the penalty, and even after Debbie ultimately eats the four pounds of food (supposedly), they still finish last.
Is it a good development to have people who abandoned a task — albeit because they thought it increased their odds of staying in the game, and not because they reached an “I don’t care if we lose anymore” point, as have past quitters — finish ahead of people who did the task? It is not.

Would it have been a good development to have people who drove two hours in the wrong direction like total morons stay in the game because somebody else wasn’t capable of eating four fucking pounds of food? Not to me. Volume-based eating challenges are stupid, and they create no-win situations, and they have nothing to do with racing, and they should be done away with immediately. BAH!

There were lots of great edits in this episode. Lots of great lines. My hunky dorks the Stackomatic-Beefeater Brothers redeemed themselves into third place. Brian jumped up and down like it was Christmas morning when he learned that his brother Greg had to down a couple of kilos of cow, because apparently Brian had been on a Fear Factor episode where he failed spectacularly on an eating challenge and it was apparently payback time.

Poor Debbie and Bianca. They tried so hard to be the cute smart girls who were going to be the first all-female team to win it all, but they turned out to be navigationally challenged. Also, Rob stole their taxi in the beginning of the leg, when they were actually getting directions at the hotel. Perhaps they got rattled by the theft (they never realized another team poached their ride) and that’s what threw them off, but they blew right by the exit from Cinco Norte (clearly marked “Los Andes,” and the clue said they had to drive over the Andes, too).

Two hours later, after stopping for directions several times, not getting a clear answer, and assuming that they were still headed the right way anyway, they finally realized the horrible truth when they got to the ocean. The Pacific one, that is. Ooops.

There were great edits – one of the best was Susan and Patrick getting directions at a gas station. Almost as navigationally challenged as Debbie and Bianca, they couldn’t find their way out of a wet paper bag, let alone Santiago Chile. You can see the Debbie/Bianca SUV in the background (and the cameraman spotted it and swung around to keep it in frame) while Team Motherboy is in the foreground, getting pointed to the route in the totally opposite direction. Oooops again.

There’s another good one after the girls finally get turned around and voice their hope that somebody got a flat or something. Cut to the Brothers, who get a flat on the mountain-bike detour and have to walk the rest of the way, dragging packs, bikes, and a flimsy looking helmet-cam rig to the clue box.

Heh. At least they didn’t give up and start hollering “My bike is BROKEN.” They just walked it off, dealt with the meat gulag, and pulled off a decent finish, much higher than “Currently in last place!”

But in spite of all that, the episode left a bad taste in the mouth. Oh, yes.

I had a beef taco salad today for lunch, and then started reading up on the TWOP episode thread and suddenly felt intense regret for the vegetarian lunch item I didn’t choose.

So instead of a standings list, here’s just a few short observations for fun:

Phil: Don’t have a cow, man – where’s the beef?
Rob: Somehow, he figured out how to cow the sheep. What a smaht-ass.
Deana: Baaad decision.
Meredith: …got Rocky Mountain Oysters?
Greg: Mmm. Juicy brains.
Ron: Mmm-hmmm. Way better than prison camp brains.
Alex: “(during) an eating challenge, the last thing I want to hear is ‘you can barf it up.'”
Uchenna: “Daaa-yummm!”
Hungry Argentinian Fly: “You gonna eat that?”
Charming Argentinian Bucket: “Hello.”
Patrick: There’s a difference between having a cow, and eating it too.
Debbie: Would you like a side of crow with your side of cow, Team Bi-Lingua Carrera?

Rambling Rambling Rambling

This post is going to be a little like a Steve Martin monologue from the 70’s – a lot of pickin, grinning, and ra-a-a-a-a-m…blinnnn. And bad fashion. Just so you know.

I haven’t been terribly productive around the house for, oh, a little over a year now. Which is just about exactly when I started the blog, coincidentally, but never mind about that now. Really, it started before that. No, wait, I’ve never been terribly productive around the house. I was more productive when Stuey (who now inhabits the Memorial Tea Caddy on the mantelpiece) was around, because I kind of had to be – you can’t let things slip too much when you’ve got a diabetic cat to look after. Also, we did a lot more projects around the house last year and the year before – after pulling off a successful party last spring about this time, we’ve kind of rested on our laurels as far as redecorating, buying furniture, and projects go (I still have to figure out how to finish up the one floor project, which is down to door jamb, trim, and some niggling bits where I may have to piece it together like a wooden quilt, especially in the closet).

So I’ve mostly concerned myself, since then, with screwing around with the blog(s), fooling around with photos and the new digital camera, and watching my favorite TV shows. Oh, and work. But that’s a necessary evil. And church, but that’s a necessary good. And travel, but that’s necessary for my own sanity.
Continue reading

One Nation, Under Ribbons

Today, so many have popped up – pledging support of everything from people with diabetes to victims of the Asian tsunami – that some find the trend laughable.

“Putting a ribbon magnet on your car is an empty gesture,” said Jay Barnes, the author of AntiMagnet, a Web site devoted to ridiculing the trend. “It’s prepackaged sentiment for a profit.'”

Jeff Poirier joined with friends to launch Support Our Ribbons, which offers magnets displaying messages such as “Support Our Ribbons,” “I Support More Troops Than You,” and “One Nation Under Ribbons.”

“Ribbons support many causes,” said Poirier, 25. “Isn’t it time that we support them?”

Hah! I knew I wasn’t the only one that thought that trend was old about a month after the ribbons first start appearing. At least someone else noticed this even more disturbing fact: they’re breeding.

There’s an SUV that parks in the lot at work that has at least 4 or 5 ribbons across the rear door. It’s almost as if they bought the SUV to go with their unusually large ribbon collection.

I’ll try to get a picture of it in all its “causier than thou” attitude.

How The British Must See Us

BBC NEWS | Americas | Court killings suspect arrested

BBC NEWS | Entertainment | Notorious BIG murder case closed

BBC NEWS | Americas | Gunman murders seven at US hotel

BBC NEWS | World | Americas | US judge family shot ‘in revenge’

BBC NEWS | Entertainment | Music | Rap crews face ban over shootings

BBC NEWS | England | Hampshire | US-based man shot dead in robbery

BBC NEWS | World | Europe | Funeral for Italian shot in Iraq

BBC NEWS | Entertainment | Arts | Thompson ‘shot himself on phone’

BBC NEWS | Americas | Memorial for shot Canadian police

Honest, we’re not all like this. Canadians too.

Will You Listen?

The bishops have repeatedly called us to listen and dialogue. When we debate, we are listening only for those parts that we can use to make our case. When we dialogue, we are seeking to understand the other person’s experience. We don’t have to agree with it. We don’t pass any judgement on it. We quiet our own internal chatter and attempt to be fully present to the other person.

Are we willing to do this? Let’s try.

We’re listening over at Holy Moly. At least, we though we were, and then a few weeks back our eyes were opened to issues that we thought settled long ago.

If you are heartily bored with the issue of gay marriage, gay clergy, or indeed anything gay, then… happy Saturday! No work until Monday!

But I beg you to be open to at least listening, anyway. That’s all. Just listen with ears and mind open if the subject should ever come up in conversation with someone you know.

Anyway. To continue.
Continue reading